layer 2 vs layer 3 wi-fi mesh networks?
Last Post: October 11, 2008:
-
I'm looking for info that describes the difference between layer 2 and layer 3 mesh networks. From what I can tell, it's something like the following:
layer 2: manageable via IP address, but you really only control the PHY/DATA link layer "stuff" (channels, 802.1Q VLAN tagging, 802.11e, etc)
layer 3: some other controller uses some sort of layer 3-ish protocol (e.g. LWAPP) to "talk" to the access points and manage the PHY/DATA link layer stuff.
Is this an accurate description? Or am I missing something?
Also, which is "better"? Is either categorically better? Or do different environments lend themselves to one solution or the other? -
The first thing that comes to mind is that a L3 solution could cross L3 boundaries between the controller and AP.
I would think that L2 would be more efficient, but I couldn't state any facts to that matter.
GT
- 1